Smart, internet-connected watches are the present and future of wearable
devices, offering to help with everything from sending quick emails and
tweets to monitoring your health. Here are the best smartwatches
available to buy right now.
Apple Watch
The most high-profile of the early smartwatches is undoubtedly
the one built by Apple. Critical reaction has not been universally
positive, but the Apple Watch
does have its fans. "It's the first [smartwatch I've tried] where I've
consciously really wanted to make sure I'm always wearing it and that
the battery doesn't run out," says the Daily Telegraph's head of technology, Matt Warman.
In the Wall Street Journal,
personal tech columnist Geoffrey A Fowler agrees. "With the Apple
Watch, smartwatches finally make sense," he writes. "The measure of
their success shouldn't be how well they suck you in, but how
efficiently they help you get things done. Living on your arm is part of
that efficiency – as a convenient display, but also a way to measure
your heart rate or pay at a cash register. This is a big idea about how
we use technology, the kind of idea we expect from Apple."
The Apple Watch may not be perfect, says Joshua Topolsky, editor of Bloomberg Digital, but it is the best option available for anyone who is already convinced they need to have a smartwatch.
"The watch is not life-changing," he says. "It is, however,
excellent. Apple will sell millions of these devices, and many people
will love and obsess over them. It is a wonderful component of a big
ecosystem that the company has carefully built over many years. It is
more seamless and simple than any of its counterparts in the
marketplace. It is, without question, the best smartwatch in the world."
Pebble Time
The Pebble Time has received rave reviews from KickStarter
backers who, as payback for their financial support, have been sent an
early version of the device prior to its full release. Independent
reviewers have been equally enthusiastic, praising the smartwatch for
doing a few things well rather than many things badly – which is the
problem with numerous other smartwatches. The Guardian's Samuel Gibbs praises the Pebble Time's long battery life, always-on screen, waterproof frame and "great music controls".
Unlike most of its competitors, the Pebble Time doesn't have a
touchscreen, but instead has a four button control system. The button on
the left acts as a back button, while the three on the right scroll up
or down through menus and select. The phone also uses a colour e-paper
display, rather than an OLED screen like on the Apple Watch. But the
decision to use a simpler screen is linked to its long battery life,
which can last for up to seven days rather than 24 hours or less.
"Sure, it doesn't offer the same degree of sophisticated style and high-end features as the competition," says Engadget's
Nicole Lee, "but if you're tired of the hubbub over Android Wear and
Apple Watch and want a decent alternative, then it could be well worth
your time."
Asus ZenWatch
When it came out last month, reviewers praised the ZenWatch for
its styling as well as its bright display and respectable battery life.
The device is "the most attractive square Android Wear watches on the
market", The Guardian said, and a "solid contender for the … Apple Watch".
According to Engadget's
Chris Velazco, "it's the first smartwatch I've worn that's ever
attracted random compliments from passersby (in two countries, no less),
not to mention the first one that didn't make me feel like a complete
nerd while wearing it."
The watch has 14 custom faces, a built-in heart rate sensor and a strong 1.63-inch Gorilla Glass 3-covered screen.
At £200, the ZenWatch is one of the more expensive Android Wear
smartwatches on the market, but it is "comfortable, looks great and
works well," the Guardian concludes.
There is an argument to be made that a round watch face provides "a more immersive touch experience" than a square one, says Android Central,
but "if that's the biggest complaint we have about the ZenWatch — and
it pretty much is — Asus has a clear winner on its hands."
Samsung Gear Live
Samsung's Gear Live sports a conservative square face, a sharp and
colourful 1.63-inch super AMOLED 320 x 320 resolution display as well as
a heart-rate monitor.
Google Now, running on Android Wear operating system, neatly presents
notifications, although reviewers do have concerns over its rather
bland look and Samsung's history of instantly obsolete products (the
firm has released five smartwatches in the last year).
"If you insist on being an early Android Wear adopter, the Samsung
Gear Live is the one to go for right now, but only by a very small
margin," says [8]Trusted Reviews. "The Gear Live and its Samsung Gear
2-inspired design means it's more elegant than the LG G Watch and has
the more impressive screen. Elsewhere, specs are almost identical, with
the unreliable heart-rate monitor the only other notable difference."
However, the tech site warns that Google Wear isn't without fault and
that "battery life remains a big problem here and is enough of a reason
to hold tight and wait for an Android Wear smartwatch that doesn't
require charging up the same amount of time as your smartphone."
Motorola Moto 360
The Moto 360 is arguably the most stylish and refined smartwatch
available today and represents a significant turnaround for languishing
Motorola.The smartwatch has a striking yet traditional watch face, runs
on the Google Android Wear operating system and features a 1.65-inch 320
x 290 resolution display, which – while not the sharpest – is toughened
and water resistant.
There are plenty of apps to choose from while you can use the
embedded Google Now function to search, check emails, text, calls,
tweets and weather – even using your own voice.
The heart-rate monitor and pedometer are less well-received by
researchers, and battery life is short, but otherwise the Moto 360 is
described by many as the best smartwatch around.
"With its stylish good looks, comfortable feel and overall premium build, the Moto 360 is the Android Wear watch to beat," says Engadget.
"When it comes to design, at least, it outclasses everything else on
the market. Aside from aesthetics, the 360 offers many of the same
features as its rivals, including a heart rate sensor and a pedometer,
plus some other goodies like wireless charging and an ambient light
sensor."
LG G Watch R
Following on from the often criticised G Watch, LG has seemingly come
up trumps with the G Watch R, which offers an improved circular
1.3-inch OLED display and a more appealing design.
Reviewers praise the watch for its bright and crisp display, a
reasonable performance from Android Wear and the styling, while the
two-day battery life is a bonus.
The voice activation function "works pretty well", says Techradar,
but "it's not perfect". On several occasions the G Watch R did not hear
the words correctly, adding "considerable delay" to composing a
message. "It also still feels rather odd talking to your wrist," says
the site.
Wired
notes that the price of the G Watch R has remained more or less the
same as the original, which is "a good thing" considering the greatly
improved styling and screen.
"But with similar processor and battery it offers no improvement in
performance, and Android Wear still needs a bit of work. Still, if you
must own an Android wearable, this is the one to have right now," it
added.
Sony Smartwatch 3
Sony's Smartwatch 3 goes against the grain of a circular design
with a rectangular face, but its 1.2GHz quad-core processor and 512MB
of RAM are powerful enough to get through tasks, while the built-in GPS
enables it to be used adequately as a fitness accessory.
The 1.6-inch 320 x 320 transflective display is sharp and water
protected, and arguably slightly better than Moto 360. The device runs
on Android Wear, which uses Google Now for notifications, and can be
used standalone from a connected smartphone. It can also be personalised
with wide range of colourful straps.
"The Sony SmartWatch 3 is a powerful and well-equipped wearable with a good screen and reasonable battery life," says TechRadar. "If it could do all that while looking like an actual wristwatch it would be a real winner, but it's still impressive."
Pebble Steel
The Kickstarter-backed Pebble has kept it simple with the
Pebble Steel, which adds a steel and leather design, a new operating
system and more applications over previous Pebble designs.
The 1.26-inch ePaper LCD screen is readable and energy-efficient, but
perhaps the best feature of the device is that it will connect with any
Apple or Android machine via Bluetooth. The 'killer' seven-day battery
life is the best on the market, while the new operating system neatly
organises your schedule into Past, Present and Future views. In
addition, Pebble Steel will let you control music on your phone,
"The Pebble Steel isn't just the best smartwatch ever, it's the
blueprint for real world wearable tech beyond the gimmicks
and glassholes we've seen so far," says Stuff magazine.
Sony SmartBand Talk SWR30
There's no shortage of wearable fitness aids on the market,
promising ever more detailed levels of activity monitoring. However, the
Sony SmartBand Talk SWR30 is one of the few models that seriously seeks
to compete with standalone smartwatches, allowing the wearer to make
and receive calls (although presumably not private ones), use voice
control, and receive messages and notifications as well as track their
fitness goals.
The SmartBand bridges the gap between fitness band and smartwatch,
displaying notifications from your Android apps in real time, but unlike
most smartwatches on the market, if you want to respond to them, you'll
have to dig out your phone.
Designed to be worn all day, the SmartBand's slim, lightweight build,
comfortable rubber wristband and e-ink display have won favourable
comments in many reviews. "Put simply," says Pocket Lint's Britta O'Boyle, "it just works."
While the SmartBand is undoubtedly impressive as a fitness aid, its
reduced functionality compared with a fully-fledged smartwatch raises
questions about its ability to compete in the market. "An intriguing
product" says TechRadar's Andrew Williams, but will anyone "actually want it?"
For Andrew Hoyle
at CNet, however, the device is strong enough to stand alone – "a
useful piece of tech to wear, even if you're not fussed about keeping
track of your activity during the day."
source: www.theweek.co.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment